- Gnucash i spent money and profits increased full version#
- Gnucash i spent money and profits increased upgrade#
- Gnucash i spent money and profits increased full#
There was, in fact, no way for me to retrieve the data I had spent 3 months collecting in the trial version – either within or outside of Quicken – unless I ponied up twice the price, and bought a new, deluxe copy of the software. Customer service was absent, and I grew a bit frustrated. A request for help to Inuit went unanswered. But surely, importing data from the trial should at least be allowed? Isn’t the point of the trial to get me to purchase the product to continue to use it? Should I really need to throw away those 3 months of data? I didn’t need any other feature from the deluxe edition – I just wanted to import data from my trial run and then use the basic version.
Gnucash i spent money and profits increased upgrade#
I thought surely this was a mistake! But no, the basic version did not allow data import – to unlock that feature required an upgrade to the “deluxe” version.
Gnucash i spent money and profits increased full#
It could handle everything my uncomplicated early personal finance situation required.Īfter installing the licensed full version, I realized that it would not allow me to import my 3 months of data from the trial version. This is what Intuit wanted, right? Since I was just getting started, I was only using the basic features of the software, and so I bought the most basic version with the fewest features.
Gnucash i spent money and profits increased full version#
When the trial ended, I purchased the full version – the ideal outcome and proof of the efficacy of trialware. The software was straightforward, powerful, and user-friendly. I downloaded a 3-month free trial to test it, and was duly impressed. When the time came for me to choose software for managing personal finances, I naturally settled on Intuit’s Quicken, which was (and still is) the clear market leader, popular commercial finance software. Like most people, I didn’t grow up using Linux, so my first exposure to almost all software was propriety. My philosophy was shaped by an early experience I had with proprietary software. But history has repeatedly shown that they, for explainable reasons, are intricately intertwined. Of course, open source software and modular standards are not the same thing. This demonstrates the power of a hardware standard. This means you only have to bring a single charge cable when you travel, and if you lose one, replacing it is cheap and simple. Today, phones can almost universally swap chargers – and not only phones, but a huge number of other small electronics, from tablets to headsets, use the same standard. Fast-forward a few years, and things are now much more interchangeable because the cell phone world has coalesced on a standard: micro USB. Replacements were expensive, and choice was minimal. If you forgot or lost your charger, chances were slim that you’d be able to locate one that matched yours. To use an analogy: In the early days of cell phones, each phone had its own power adapter. This leads to the key advantage of modularity. My primary reason for preferring open source software is that it is more likely to support open data standards. I do this not because of cost, but because of my basic philosophy of software and data freedom. Though I grew up using proprietary software like Windows, Microsoft Office, MacOS, etc., I now use open alternatives like Linux almost exclusively. I strongly prefer to use and support free software.
0 kommentar(er)
